FDA Unveils Graphic Warning Labels On Cigarette Packs
#1
Posted 21 June 2011 - 12:23 PM
Also, I am curious to know why the FDA is not equally critical of alcohol companies, which puts tons of ads on television, magazines, public property, etc. Why not have pictures of diseased livers on Budweiser cans and on bottles of acetaminophen? I am curious to know the political reasons as to why tobacco companies are uniquely targeted, while other equally dangerous products are ignored. Both alcohol and tobacco are historically ingrained into our culture.
http://www.ny1.com/c...cigarette-packs
12:23 PM
FDA Unveils Graphic Warning Labels On Cigarette Packs
By: Kafi Drexel
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration unveiled Tuesday several new graphic warning labels that will now appear on cigarette packs to discourage current and potential smokers from lighting up.
By the fall of 2012, attention-grabbing images like rotting gums and teeth and corpses on slabs will be on all cigarette packs and ads throughout the country.
[ . . . ]
Full text at http://www.ny1.com/c...cigarette-packs
#2
Posted 21 June 2011 - 12:26 PM
#3
Posted 21 June 2011 - 12:27 PM
i can't speak to alcohol, because the line is more blurred, there, but the acetaminophen comparison is specious; tobacco causes diseased lungs, gums, and teeth when used as specified, while acetaminophen will not harm your liver if used properly.Why not have pictures of diseased livers on Budweiser cans and on bottles of acetaminophen?
"The despotism of heaven is the one absolutely perfect government. An earthly despotism would be the absolutely perfect earthly government, if the conditions were the same; namely, the despot the perfectest individual of the human race, and his lease of life perpetual. But as a perishable perfect man must die, and leave his despotism in the hands of an imperfect successor, an earthly despotism is not merely a bad form of government, it is the worst form that is possible."
-Mark Twain
#4
Posted 21 June 2011 - 12:34 PM
but the acetaminophen comparison is specious; tobacco causes diseased lungs, gums, and teeth when used as specified, while acetaminophen will not harm your liver if used properly.
Acetaminophen damages the liver: http://www.hashkafah..._1#entry1512816
#5
Posted 21 June 2011 - 12:49 PM
#6
Posted 21 June 2011 - 12:54 PM
Now you're just messing with a woman's right to choose...I demand pictures of fetuses before abortions.
Shame on you, misogynist!
________________________________
"Frumkeit without Mentchlichkeit is not Yiddishkeit!" - Razie
"If you don't sin... Jesus died for nothing."
"because teaching is all about obscuration and obfuscation.." - Snag
#7
Posted 21 June 2011 - 01:01 PM
#8
Posted 21 June 2011 - 04:53 PM
If they really want people to stop smoking, they'll put a nekked pic of KR on every pack...
That would stop people from eating.
הַתְקַשֵּׁר מַעֲדַנּוֹת כִּימָה אוֹ-מֹשְׁכוֹת כְּסִיל תְּפַתֵּחַ
#9
Posted 21 June 2011 - 04:57 PM
"i have come to believe that belle is closer to the truth" - Snag
"Belle is, of course, right." - Razie
#10
Posted 21 June 2011 - 04:58 PM
Which is good because they will now have increased appetites from quitting smoking!!!That would stop people from eating.
#11
Posted 22 June 2011 - 10:11 AM
"Be open minded, But, not so open minded that your brains fall out!"
" I mean how do you greet moshiach if half a baby is hanging out of your hoo ha??" Bird
#12
Posted 22 June 2011 - 11:26 AM
I demand pictures of fetuses before abortions.
after
I don't agree! I'm just lazy to type.
#13
Posted 22 June 2011 - 12:56 PM
I meant, before abortions, I demand pictures of foetuses. (Note the old-school spelling.) (And the hyphen in old-school.)after
#14
Posted 22 June 2011 - 07:16 PM
Absolutely true. If the government really wanted people to quit they would make cigarettes illegal - just like other other substances. The government loves to get the political benefit of pretending they care about people's health while raking in the tax dollars from sin taxes.The government should really stop pretending they want people to quit smoking. They love the dollars they get from taxing smokers....the country might just collapse if every smoker quit. This campaign is gross and I predict it will have little if any effect.
"Are you including as shomer negiya someone who is sleeping with his girlfriend but not shaking hands with the car dealer?" ~ Moshi
"Some people like their corn flakes soggy, other people get off on repression and guilt." ~ Sweet
Notice of New Policy: I now ask people permission before using their quotes.
#15
Posted 23 June 2011 - 01:21 AM
Yeah cuz the war on drugs and prohibition has worked SO well...Absolutely true. If the government really wanted people to quit they would make cigarettes illegal - just like other other substances. The government loves to get the political benefit of pretending they care about people's health while raking in the tax dollars from sin taxes.
#16
Posted 23 June 2011 - 06:24 AM
Well prohibition was an unmitigated disaster, but I am certain that fewer people would smoke if cigarettes were illegal. There are people who would quit once they would have to pay some shady looking guy on a street corner in a bad neighborhood for a pack rather than picking it up at the convenience store.Yeah cuz the war on drugs and prohibition has worked SO well...
"Are you including as shomer negiya someone who is sleeping with his girlfriend but not shaking hands with the car dealer?" ~ Moshi
"Some people like their corn flakes soggy, other people get off on repression and guilt." ~ Sweet
Notice of New Policy: I now ask people permission before using their quotes.
#17
Posted 23 June 2011 - 08:24 AM
And then there are those who would do it anyway. Cue the turf wars, and bodies on the streets.Well prohibition was an unmitigated disaster, but I am certain that fewer people would smoke if cigarettes were illegal. There are people who would quit once they would have to pay some shady looking guy on a street corner in a bad neighborhood for a pack rather than picking it up at the convenience store.
#18
Posted 23 June 2011 - 09:39 AM
I don't think that's strictly true. Sure the government likes taxes, but even without the tax factor they wouldn't be able to just pull the plug on a billion dollar industry overnight. Doing it this way preserves some kind of options for the tobacco industry, while supposedly cutting down on smoking.Absolutely true. If the government really wanted people to quit they would make cigarettes illegal - just like other other substances. The government loves to get the political benefit of pretending they care about people's health while raking in the tax dollars from sin taxes.
#19
Posted 23 June 2011 - 01:04 PM
I can only think that smoking is associated with freedom and rebellion and we are entering a new world order of mentally enslaved zombie citizens.
#20
Posted 23 June 2011 - 02:18 PM
-Benjamin Constant
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users







