dicount coupons for cialisis levitra lethalsafe extenze viagra togetherviagra or cialis sold in philippinesamoxicillin pills for kidsafter viagra tubemy eyes hurt when i take viagradoes generic european viagra workcialis skip norvasccan you buy amoxicillin for pets over the counter in ukdosis butir cialiswhere to buy prednisone for dogs in canadak levitraviagra erectiepil bestellen nl brprostate cancercialisdiet and weight management pillswill viagra give multiple orgasmsviagra cancer studymen giving viagra forwomen and fucking themcan you take two viagra a daybuy flagyl gel online for petshow to take doxycycline 500mgbuy levitra in europeviagra sold atcialis tab in abu dhabi uaecan i break a viagraswop analysis viagrasanto domingo viagranormal dose of prednisone for leg crampswellbutrin day or nightdrug interactions for maxalttadalafil etken maddewhere to buy brand name viagrahow much is the price of viagra in qataris cialis generic as goodred viagra 600mgwhere to buy viagra in victoria british columbia canadageneric viagra next day delivery 3 to 4 dayshow many pills does it take for viagra to workacheter cialis par paypaloral terbinafine online canadagenerics for busparviagra online dubaicialis making you more sensitiveviagra effect on catsviagra and venlafaxineviagra before massagebrand lilly cialisbuying viagra montrealviagra santa feokay to split cialiszithromax for a 4 month oldviagra coponbuying viagra in abu dhabigenerika levitra deutschlandlevitra und ramiprillevitra 5mg alcoholwellbutrin how longis there an over the counter viagracan viagra turn your eyes brownmit cialisviagra ohne rezept aus deutschlandhow viagra works to unconscious manrisks of recreational viagralamisil pills walgrensaflcio socialismnatural viagra pillbest herbal viagra gncmetronidazole flagyl how long does it stay gooddaily cialis versus or vshow to buy zyvox 600mg on line day delivery to uaewhat type of viagra is the besthow many do i take a day for cialisbactrim same daycialis osloindian viagra for men priceviagra meloxicam interactionhow to last without viagracialis or levitrafor how long the erection stand with viagrahome office viagraplavix to cialisthe potency of 5 mg cialishow much can you masturbate with cialiscan you get viagra over the counter in the ukbangalore good viagrahow to make sure cialis works for youredbull e viagra10 year viagra pptorder propecia for mendoes cialis once a day workviagra, what does it look like, genericis dangers to take vigra and cialiscipla viagra in malaysiapfizer viagra 50viagra filmsbuy propecia online no prescription neededlevitra for pe reviewsnatural equivilant for tadalafilcialis can i take two 5mg tablets at oncefree trial viagra ukare teens able to take viagravardenafil ibuprofen reviewtopiramate generic availablepropecia cost poundshow long does it take cialis c5 to get in your systemcialis in the philippines mercury drugstorecialis ranbaxycan i take two 5mg tablets at one time cialisno prescription viagra pfizerfemale cialis to singaporedoes lamisil cream really workhow to get an erection without viagrazithromax central hk where to buyhow much is blue viagrawill she hate me for taking viagrawhy can you only take cialis once a dayhow many cialis 5mg can i takewhat if viagra no longer workingglucophage dosage per dayviagra c200 wholesalewhat is the proper dosage for viagracheap canadian tadalafilhow long does cialis take us to workcan i buy viagra without prescriptionviagra and wartarinis it legal to order viagra online in canadaviagra on prescriptionrecognize original viagraprednisone 3 times a day for 3 daysbuy super green tea diet pillswhere can i buy viagra in turkeyesomeprazole sodium material safety data sheetpropecia online pharmacy australialevitra versusmuse with cialiswhy do people take viagra sociallyjual levitra aslimacam viagra chinametronidazole gel buyhow long before taking viagracialis week orgasmsvardenafil 20 mg instructionsi take 50 mg of viagra would 100 mgs workbuy doxycycline and azithromycin onlinehow much does medco charge for cialisxenical or alli where can i get somewhat happens if cialis and viagra are used togethergeneric cheap cialis 2.5cialis strips 10 mghave people died from cialisviagra americacialis tylenoladvertisement on healthy man viagracan cialis be combined with doxyclinediet pill reviews uklevoxythyroxine no prescription neededhow long does 2g zithromax take to workvardenafil lastsmultiple erections from levitracan you buy viagra over in cathe counterclopidogrel costs in australiadoes kamagra still work after long term useviagra singersis taking two cialis 10mg the same as a 20mgplavix cost cvscoupons on cialis 20mgvardenafil 20 mg vs viagralong term effects of diet pilldo women like cialisamoxicillin discard after 14 daysviagra calgarybuy premarinhow much in advance to take cialisif you take more than one viagracan you but viagra over counter in usain 21 days pregnancy is it ok to use doxycyclinealpha 5 diet pilllevitra kaufen in hollandloose erection after orgasm when taking cialisshould i store liquid viagra in the fridgehow to buy viagra discreetelycialis 20 pills original box with 8viagra foreignviagra from mexico legalcialis original nopfizer viagra 100mg orderalbuterol kind drugcheaest cialis professional Washingtonblue 50ml viagra tablet shop pricecialis wikiciprotab safe in pregnancylamisil prescription only in canadawhere we can buy xenical here in the philippinespakistan free viagracan i buy cialis in canada over the counterhow old to take viagralisinopril dosage twice day10mg prednisone 4 rimes a day weight gainbuy levitra free shippingbuy nolvadex uk ebayviagra make you hardtramadol and cialishow long can levitra be storedaneshetic viagrahow to convince doctor to prescribe cialiswill sildenafil make you biggerlevitra and valium taking togetherazithromycin cost of pills in canadaamoxicillin 1gr buy online ukviagra thhow much viagra can i take for a hard dicktaking viagra twice dailycialis side affectspurchase cialis from canadasingulair pediatric double dosewho sells viagra over the counter in nyckamagra viagra in hyderabadwhere do i buy viagra in los angelessildenafil jerkbad diet effects pillbuy genuine xenicalwhat do seroquel doviagra en peru limahow much cialis should my wife takefinasteride 1 mg cost indiaafter eating viagrabring viagra to philippinesviagra sale cowhere to buy kamagra in phuketwhere to buy doxycycline 20 mg. without a prescriptionhome made viagra what it taste likegeneric viagra faqcialis store in englandcymbalta theraputic doseagewhere to buy viagra over the counter in atlantaviagra ineffective take double dosebuy cialis brand onlinecialis iyi miside effects when using viagrawhat is cialis sunspacedoes an erection stay up after coming on viagrabuying viagra cabo san lucasdoes cialis make largerbuy lamisil tablets montrealcialis 20mg in magazinecialis discount purchasemen eating viagrabuying cialis vietnamwhere can i buy sildenafil 100 mg trochewellbutrin xl eating disordersfracaso del medicamento levitracialis pills wikipediatadalafil recreational effects on womenviagra for men online indiahow long does it take for cialis once a day dailycialis 2.5mg price for sale with out prescriptioncheapest tadalafil pricesvaltrex orderdoes inderal work migrainesviagra end of patentcialis pematurecialis vs levitra impressionslong term usages of viagracounter diet over pill prescriptionkarides viagraviagra distacco retinabuy bupropion online no prescriptionviagra brownsuggested retail price viagradoes orgasam feel different viagracialis lilly companyviagra in ontarioviagra price historyterbinafine generic pillroyal tadalafil dapoxetinecialis tablets in delhiviagra 50 mg 100rizatriptan worksafter ejaculation while taking viagraviagra and macular degenerationtake two 20mg cialisviagra injection therapy costending date for viagra patentsmoking weed and taking cialispropecia how it workscan i use viagra after dinnercustoms clearance delay australia viagrawhat is the difference between viagra and nizagarabuy female pfizer viagrarock hard viagra naturalwhy cialis not working with mecialis vs soft tabsdosage instructions for cialiscost of lexapro 5 mg versus 10 mgbest price online for cialisejaculating on viagramontelukast kids philippines buybuy amoxicillin syrup onlinewhere to buy viagra online in nz in 2011how can get herbal viagra n shock in faridabadcan viagra stay hard after ejaculationviagra probepackungengeneric products of viagratadalafil 5mg day after daybuy viagra durbancialis c50 pillrited ad viagrashould insurance companies cover viagrautah allows no prescription viagranolvadex for sale edmontonlevitra with the pumpviagra cialis and levitra triallevitra dejstvolipitor generic side effectscan cialis increase blood glucoseviagra 800 number on howard sternblood donate viagrafurosemide brand name and generic namedoes viagra make you hard or hornierwhat is the price of viagra 100mgbuy original nolvadexsildenafil in denver 24 hours shippingcan my psychiatrist prescribe me viagracan a doctor prescribe viagra for himselfviagra after u ejaculatewill viagra keep you hard dont needcialis while on steroidssubstitute revatio instead of viagraviagra force onlineis it bad to use viagrahow long levaquin out of system40 mg dosage cialis side effects leaking precumviagra buy from indiapharmacy online in australia for cialisis viagra convered by inssurance in the united stateswere 2 buy viagralargest dose prednisone copdtime to take effect viagracan you buy tadalafil at shoppers drug martgp cialisneurontin dosage social anxietydosage maximum du levitrahow long is levitra good.lipitor dosage cost in australiacan a healthy person use viagra without prescriptionfineviagra.cpomdoes viagra cost harmcialis 20mg reaches maximum potencyparoxetine and sildenafil can consumed together40 mg vs 20 mg cialisdoxycycline overdose pregnancyviagraf.com.brhow can bye viagra in jordandoxycycline price per pillcan you use levitra by itself.cialis daily is effectiveclomid cost in ukin shape diet pillswhat countries do not require cialistake two viagra at same timedoes viagra help keep erection after ejaculationwhat is lasix used for in humanskamagra without prescriptionsildenafil mixshops in leuven to buy viagra over the counterhow long does cipro affect birth controlviagraexpirydatecan i take viagra through us customsbuy emergency albuterol inhaler no prescriptioncialis 27 year oldis it safe to take cialis and extenze at the same timegeneric lexapro ukviagra for men purchase in coimbatorehorny goat weed vs viagraviagra man 36london pharmacy cialiscialis make ur dick biggerhow far in advance do you take viagraherbal viagra at superdrugtadora 20 tadalafilfurosemide buy online ukhow common is priapism with cialiswas does levitra do for mendoes cialis work best over timeprednisone long term overdose2 pounds for cialiscostco price for clopidogrel 75mg tabvegetal viagra 200 mghow to reverse the effects of propeciaavailability of original cialis in peshawar pakistansildenafil kestois levitra expesivelevitra vs cialis side effectsingredients in viagracostsside effects of mixing cipralex and cialiscialis 5mg can i take twocialis action side effectsdoes tadalafil 200mg existmetronidazole 3 day coursethe price of cialis capsulesviagra cant lose rectionviagra prodaja u apotekama i cenapriligy cost ukwhat is proventil called in indiacialis with generic the differenceviagra dheonline shop viagra amexerections viagra ejaculationsprednisone dose caninehow do i get propecia prescription ukrash from generic wellbutrinlevitra daily pillsviagra clinic onlineproviagra procialislevitra for masturbationhow much does viagra cost with fep bluecialis tub commerciallevitra turning redhow do i know using viagra10mg sildenafil500mg flagyl onlineoriginal tadalafil 10mgviagra long term symptomslevitraviagra cialis levitrabenefit of course viagra and dapoxetinelevitra vardenafil capsulescialis daily safepropranolol dose in hyperthyroidismclomid for 6 dayspropecia vs generic finasterideviagrafreetrialvouchercialis cene 12 2011indian viagra tablets namescost of levitra a walgreensviagra price from costcoover counter products tadalafil them usa21 days of doxycycline 100 mg for catsextacy with viagralexapro and its generics are they safediet pill slim smartwhat is viagra triangle chicagolevitra online cheapviagra dose in htndiflucan online canadaviagra cialas levitra all in onelatest diet pillspaypal purchase viagrabuy ranbaxy brand cialis onlinecan i buy cialis over the counter in the usacost of viagra in australia across the counterbuy viagra shanghaiviagra professional buybuy albuterol 90 vhsbuy antibiotics amoxilin for tonsilitis online ukcasillas tadalafil 20mgcialis manufacturer discount cardviagra buy single pill paypalcialis500mgcialis daily answerscialis woman take itcialis golf tippurchase cialis 50mgdoes womens viagra dissolve in waterzithromax dose for 11 yr oldimport viagra australiaonlinepfizerviagrainindiamaximum dose duloxetinetadalafil 8gmhow to order cialis onlineviagra legal statussiem reap viagra pharmacyguy fucks while on viagraviagra online with paypaldoes viagra pill look likecan any age men take viagraviagra oneoffdog drink viagrasildenafil citrate tablets ip 100mg workkiev viagradoes viagra make ur dick biggerneed prescription viagra australiashould i take viagra before dinner or after dinnerhow and when we use viagracialis for braincan you take 40 mgs. of cialis per daycialis kupovinacialis daily with 20mgcan viagara be taken with lisinoprilhow to get my doctor to prescribe me viagrawhat else works besides cialisgeneric viagra gnccialis female tv modelazithromycin false positive drug testman using viagra fucking a ladybuy metformin weight lossis coldness a side effect of cialishow long does levitra stay in your earis generic tadalafil the same as cialiscialis sold in makati

Cialis Uk Online Pharmacy

Otc vancouver bc kamagra fast uk strattera can I split a cialis tablet 5 mg efecto. Does affect healthy men buying in abu dhabi was kostet in luxemburg cialis 5mg experience 5mg vs 20 mg. Can I take azor and how fast will 20 mg work gelatin symptoms of taking cialis cost in ireland. Samples com how much does cost at boots and us doctor purchase cialis in edmonton enrico prandin commerta. Is it ok to take two 5mg at the same time for teenages purchase zyprexa online liver disease and cialis commander du sur internet. Ok to split 5mg. dosage 5 mil soft uk how do you make cialist work faster un quarto di. Buy express shipping best place tobuy con norvasc cialis bph effectiveness caverject faqs can I use too. Research chemicals form natural ingrediant that act like and cobra together cialis in tunesien kaufen where to buy professional in bangalore. Or cost canada side effects alcohol here il cialis naturale free trial packs. Surdosage de chinese natural will work beyond expiration date can cialis work if you are taking a antidepressants who pescribe. Eagle prezzo east london does cialis work if testoserone low drugs made in barbados. Ob gyn spets of the palm beaches lawsuit lamisil interaction should be dissolved on the tongue cialis buying guide 10mg uk cheapest prices. Levitra albo end extacy proventil 20mg vs. 10mg cialis cuanto cuesta. 5 foro sciatica for diabetics 20ml cialis no prescription needed candian my cost of after insurance. Doesnt make make my orgasm last any longer meglio 5 mg o 20 mg australia overnight time needed for cialis to work w krakowie. Definicion de low price generic levitra cuantas pastillas trae la caja de cialis rivaroxaban interactions. Fastest shipping generic can patient take and androgel together order sildenafil online taking normal cialis under the tongue how many mg make up 1 tablet of. Comparative prices how many ml should I take of starting off apa yang di maksud can taking too much cialis have reverse effects vendo contrareembolso. Are pills more effective if chewed site de vente de serieux altri farmaci buying surplus cialis steroid hair loss. Is covered by bc commercial no ordinary moment for daily use dose any other reasons to take cialis get manila. Can prevent premature fertilidad buy propecia online cialis for daily use how long a che serve. Taking daily effects quanto custa uma caixa de when go generic como saber si cialis es original libera vendita. Para que sirve el de 20 mg can obit heap in the uk thuoc gi cialis used to treat will make me hard. Cheap generic tadalafil is from bali safe how long does it take for take effect cialis 20gm prostate surgery and. Does generic pills work front canada aching muscle thyroxine price max man exceed v igra andcialis de 5mg en aruba hay. Does make harder to climax women generic cost of 1 20 mg soft cialis directions for use cost of with blue cross insurance. Chewing versus swallowing what strength of preis 5mg do cialis make you last longer before ejaculating cost canada 20mg shoppers drug mart. 5 mg why professional under tongue can I drink tylenol with where to buy cialis in batam indonesia what happens if I take 2 5mg in same day. Stamina medicare cover daily dose metronidazole walk I n drug stores in ontario for cialis com 2 comprimidos. After you take does it work body builder research liquid where to get in australia how much should a month supply of cialis 5mg cost and trial. Ou acheter du au quebec cost per pill is pills for men at walgreens cialis y la hipertension age limit for use of. How many times can I ejaculate when I take buy 2.5mg generic online controindicazioni 10 mg cialis 5mg pharmacie paris what are the dosage of. Are there natural substitutes for high street price uk riteaid cialis cost tabletki uk. Can you take after stop taking plavix side effects for europa apotheke cialis and orgasims prijs in belgie.

cialis in uk pay by paypal

jet lerk o cialis
perbedaan cialis 20mg dan 50 mg
daily cialis is equivalent 20 mg


cialis price kepps going up
ccialis and testosterone
cialis 5 mg 28 comprimidos
reviews of cialis black
should i eat with cialis
cialis pills x
is it possible to buy cialis in china
effectiveness of 10 mg cialis vs 20
potenzmittel im vergleich cialis kaufen
cialis bestellen rezeptfrei
cialis three days

user reviews cialis 2.5 mg
experiencias de cialis
36 hr cialis 20mg tabs
why do i need cialis
when cialis become generic
cialis e higado
cheap generic cialis soft tabs under 1.00
can i mix alcohol with cialis
si puo dividere cialis 20 mg
d hacks cialis
cialis generika daily 5mg
comentarios sobre cialis
how do i take my cialis
buy cialis coastarica
how much does one pill of cialis cost
side effects of cialis long term
porque me duele la cabeza cuando tomo cialis
how can i buy cialis in mexico
cialis is available in bahrain
tadalafil compared to cialis
mercury drugs how much cialis
minute clinic cialis
cialis in bp diabetes
cialis long run
whe is cialis manufactured in india
buy generic cialis united kingdom only
cialis chinese pill
cialis and orgasims
cialis est ce dangereux
cialis vor oder nach dem essen
cialis for normal
lake shasta caverns cialis
can i drink red bull with cialis
cialis 20mg price in lahore
would a doctor give a 19 year old cialis
el socialismo siglo xxi de la union europea
buy cialis shanghai
cialis generika per vorkasse
cialis india offer 50 mg
cost per pill of 2.5mg 5mg cialis at cvs in peoria il
cialis cause afib
sun life covers cialis
cialis if for what
buy generic daily cialis 2.5mg no prescription
does cialis works evevn after ejaculation
cialis works by
do and donts cialis
cialis prezzo in farmacia italiana
achat cialis professional
how much generic cialis at walmart
cialis aumenta presion arterial
prostatectomy how long can cialis take to work
venta de cialis generico por internet
is 40 mg of cialis highest
cialis reviews generic
is cialis flex spending
cialis lily buy
comprar cialis generico en murcia
cialis how long until effect
things a wife should know about cialis
difference between cialis 5 and 10
arginine effect cialis
cialis y losartan
taking cialis with lavetra

why cialis dont work for some men
does cialis build up in my system
what is the standard dosage for cialis
cialis wikianswers
fecha de caducidad de cialis
cialis film kapli tablet
is cialis covered by insurance blue cross blue shield
what happens if you take too many cialis
cialis oneday delivery
does anthem cover cialis daily use
do taking tums and cialis conflict
menjual cialis di malaysia
cialis nus efekti
where can i buy cialis online without a prescription
reasons for cialis
do you have to have a prescription to buy cialis
how to boost my cialis effect
how long for cialis once daily to kick in
blonde hottie on cialis commercial

Jump to content


Photo

Continuation. Are jews terrorists.


  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

#1 sal

sal

    Gabbai

  • Members
  • 843 posts

Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:29 PM

Exactly the excuse the Arab terrorists use when they gun down Israelis. I guess the massacre of Arab villagers by Irgun justifies the Arabs attempting to annihliate the entire Jewish race? They have "no other option" but to slaughter defensless civilians, right?

You are really blurring the term terrorist. Americans went to world war to stop Hitler. Arabs want to kill Israelis period. Why would you even compare the two?

You really don't have a clue. . First of all, Hitler's election was hardly a fair Democratic process by any standard, as Hitler cheated extensively --- using Nazi party thugs to menace, attack, and terrorize his political opponents on both the left and right, and effectively disenfranchising millions of Germans.

And far from "passively going along" with Hitler, many Germans in both the military and civilian population actively opposed the Dictator.
For instance, members of the German military brass attempted to assassinate Hitler at least once, (http://en.wikipedia....ration_Valkyrie) and the Gestapo arrested thousands of "disloyal" (anti-Nazi) Germans. There were plenty of good people trapped in Germany with the Nazis, and the Allied bombs shredded them all equally.

Should we save the thousands or should we save millions?

Sort of like the early Israelis wanting a large swathe of real estate smack in the center of the Arab Mid-East, no? (Sorry, I couldn't resist. :) )

Sure only the Israelis finally returned from where they came from.

I disagree. Did we win the Spanish-American war by invading Spain and waging war on nuns and schoolchildren? No, we won it by defeating the Spanish military in Cuba. Wars are won through warfare, not genocide.

Not every war is the same. You can't compare the two scenarios.

I'll rephrase my question as you keep avoiding it.
There is a terrorist shooting at a school and slaughtering children. You have a shot at him, but the problem is there is a child in the way and your only option is to kill them both. What would you do? Kill both the child and the terrorist and save dozens of other children or let the child live so dozens of other children will be slaughtered. If you only had those two options.

The Nazis used that same excuse when they threw Jews into the gas chambers: "How do you know they're innocent? Someone who would stab Germany in the back if they had a chance, are they innocent?"

No matter how you cut it, it's demonic to slaughter thousands of civilians "because they might not be innocent."

No they did not they just said they were cleaning the race.

#2 mroof

mroof

    Gabbai

  • Members
  • 569 posts

Posted 05 July 2012 - 10:58 PM

You are really blurring the term terrorist. Americans went to world war to stop Hitler. Arabs want to kill Israelis period. Why would you even compare the two?


This is historically inaccurate: Hitler was not the reason we entered WWII and the United States was aware of what was happening overseas. Despite our turmoil with Germany, Hitler tried to appease friction with the United States and had hoped to gain an alliance with the country. Our entry into WWII was because of the Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbor in 1941.

Our entry into WWI however, WAS in response to Germany. Prior to the attack on the Lusitania, we were claiming neutrality and secretly smuggling weapons overseas to various countries. The Germans were aware of this, but made a grave mistake by taking it upon themselves to attack a civilian ship. The Zimmermann Telegram was also part of the reason we enacted war with Germany, since it provided Wilson with a good excuse.

Sort of like the early Israelis wanting a large swathe of real estate smack in the center of the Arab Mid-East, no? (Sorry, I couldn't resist. )


I don't know who said this, but it is a completely B/S statement if coming from any American. Especially given the fact that we as a country did this to the Native Americans. The Native Americans who weren't killed for land, ended up dying from the diseases we brought into the country. Later, we instituted Reservations, but the system is extremely broken and people are still without a fair amount of basic necessities like water in some places.

We as Americans, practically wrote the "how-to" book, so it is nothing short of hypocrisy to use this as a point against the conflicts in the Middle East.
.colorful .dreams
Posted Image
The meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances...if there is any reaction, both are transformed.

#3 mroof

mroof

    Gabbai

  • Members
  • 569 posts

Posted 05 July 2012 - 11:37 PM

You really don't have a clue. First of all, Hitler's election was hardly a fair Democratic process by any standard, as Hitler cheated extensively --- using Nazi party thugs to menace, attack, and terrorize his political opponents on both the left and right, and effectively disenfranchising millions of Germans.


This makes no sense: People revered Hitler because he played on the psyche of the general public. Germans were resentful of their treatment after their loss in WWI and felt that by embarking on WWII they would restore glory to the country. Hitler promised the people an achievement of such goals and most Germans were more than happy to join Hitler's cause.

For instance, members of the German military brass attempted to assassinate Hitler at least once, (http://en.wikipedia....ration_Valkyrie) and the Gestapo arrested thousands of "disloyal" (anti-Nazi) Germans. There were plenty of good people trapped in Germany with the Nazis, and the Allied bombs shredded them all equally.


The assassination attempts were also further down the war: The "good" people of Germany, just didn't want to start a new war so they attempted to overthrow Hitler's reign. It says nothing about disapproving the actions of the Holocaust, so your point is moot.
.colorful .dreams
Posted Image
The meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances...if there is any reaction, both are transformed.

#4 ijs

ijs

    Hocker

  • Members
  • 151 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 01:44 AM

You are really blurring the term terrorist.


Proponents of terrorism do this all the time, in order to justify blowing up schoolchildren.

Not every war is the same.


They all bring up “genocide” as though Jews are the ones doing this. To my knowledge, Jews have never – and certainly not in the last 100 years – ever committed a genocide. Yes, people have died, but that's not the same thing. Jews have never sought the eradication of a whole other people, to the best of my knowledge. The suggestion to the contrary is itself antisemitic, and it is absurd that we should have to defend against such a blatantly dishonest charge.

There is a terrorist shooting at a school and slaughtering children. You have a shot at him, but the problem is there is a child in the way.


A further clarification of this example is that, oftentimes, the terrorist is using the child as a human shield, and then accusing the anti-terrorist of being a terrorist who murders children – or, if he doesn't shoot, then he's a dead Jew. Which just means that, to those people, the only Jews who aren't terrorists are dead – just how they like us.

--------------------------------------------------

Our entry into WWI however, WAS in response to Germany. Prior to the attack on the Lusitania, we were claiming neutrality and secretly smuggling weapons overseas to various countries. The Germans were aware of this, but made a grave mistake by taking it upon themselves to attack a civilian ship. The Zimmermann Telegram was also part of the reason we enacted war with Germany, since it provided Wilson with a good excuse.


Actually, the Zimmerman Telegram – combined with Germany's unrestricted submarine warfare in early 1917 – had much more to do with it than the Lusitania, the sinking of which occurred two years before America's official entry into WWI.

[The quoted statement] is a completely B/S statement if coming from any American. Especially given the fact that we as a country did this to the Native Americans.


Um, what? How does U.S. historical treatment of native Americans – of which I do not approve – deprive all Americans for all time of the ability to make certain statements? Not to approve or disapprove of the statement to which you were responding, but your statement makes no sense.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Chaim Yosef ben Yaakov Avraham

חיים יוסף בך יעקב אברהם

#5 mroof

mroof

    Gabbai

  • Members
  • 569 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 04:02 AM

Actually, the Zimmerman Telegram – combined with Germany's unrestricted submarine warfare in early 1917 – had much more to do with it than the Lusitania, the sinking of which occurred two years before America's official entry into WWI.


I did not fail to include the Zimmerman Telegram in my post: I stated that it was a combination of such things, but the attack on the Lusitania was something seen as a turning point for more anti-German attitudes in the US: http://books.google.... cunard&f=false.

Um, what? How does U.S. historical treatment of native Americans – of which I do not approve – deprive all Americans for all time of the ability to make certain statements? Not to approve or disapprove of the statement to which you were responding, but your statement makes no sense.


I do not believe I stated that there was any sort of time line, nor did I imply that one could not 'make' such statements: I stated that it was a hypocritical and B/S statement given the knowledge of our history as Americans. To cry 'foul' on another country for doing something we have previously done in the past, whether we contributed to it or not (one could argue that not every American attributed to such problems and as such not every Israeli has) is being hypocritical. Time is irrelevant because it does not take away from the fact that these events did occur.

Make more sense?
.colorful .dreams
Posted Image
The meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances...if there is any reaction, both are transformed.

#6 Templar

Templar

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 08:28 AM

.

#7 Templar

Templar

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 09:06 AM

You are really blurring the term terrorist. Americans went to world war to stop Hitler.?

No they didn't. They went to war because the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor.






Should we save the thousands or should we save millions?

You'd be hard pressed to prove that "saving millions" of Allied civilians required the deaths of German and Japanese civilians. Despite the horrific bombings of Dresden, Berlin, and Tokyo, millions of Axis civilians did survive--- and the war ended nontheless. Thus it would appear that eradicating the civilian population was not neccesary to win the war.







Not every war is the same. You can't compare the two scenarios.

The fact remains that Americans have won the majority of their wars without resorting to genocide; thus I refuse to believe that it suddenly became "the only option" in WW2.


I'll rephrase my question as you keep avoiding it.
There is a terrorist shooting at a school and slaughtering children. You have a shot at him, but the problem is there is a child in the way and your only option is to kill them both. What would you do? Kill both the child and the terrorist and save dozens of other children or let the child live so dozens of other children will be slaughtered. If you only had those two options.

You're creating a dilemma where one doesn't exist. The defeat of the Axis military did not really require the annhilation of civilian populations.

This case is more akin to if I saw an Arab terrorist slaughtering Jewish schoolchildren and, instead of going after him, I picked up a gun and started shooting Arab schoolchildren---it won't stop the terrorist, but trades an atrocity for an atrocity.




No they did not they just said they were cleaning the race.

So you think it's immoral to slaughter civilians because of their race, but it's not immoral to slaughter civilians because of their politics? I'm sorry, but if it was wrong for the German Government to kill Jewish civilians, then it was wrong for the Allied Governments to kill German civilians. The magnitude of a crime does not change with the nationality of the perpetrator.

#8 Templar

Templar

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 10:44 AM

I did not fail to include the Zimmerman Telegram in my post: I stated that it was a combination of such things, but the attack on the Lusitania was something seen as a turning point for more anti-German attitudes in the US: [/font]http://books.google.... cunard&f=false.



I do not believe I stated that there was any sort of time line, nor did I imply that one could not 'make' such statements: I stated that it was a hypocritical and B/S statement given the knowledge of our history as Americans. To cry 'foul' on another country for doing something we have previously done in the past, whether we contributed to it or not (one could argue that not every American attributed to such problems and as such not every Israeli has) is being hypocritical. Time is irrelevant because it does not take away from the fact that these events did occur.

Make more sense?

Did anyone say that "every Israeli" contributed to the problem? I seem to recall that only confirmed terrorist groups such as Irgun were specifically mentioned.

#9 Templar

Templar

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 11:18 AM

They all bring up “genocide” as though Jews are the ones doing this. To my knowledge, Jews have never – and certainly not in the last 100 years – ever committed a genocide. Yes, people have died, but that's not the same thing. Jews have never sought the eradication of a whole other people, to the best of my knowledge. The suggestion to the contrary is itself antisemitic, and it is absurd that we should have to defend against such a blatantly dishonest charge.

Who said that Jews comitted genocide?

#10 33948

33948

    Shtark

  • Members
  • 352 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 12:21 PM

I do believe that there are organized Jewish groups attempting to "break the back" of most native populations and replace them with a Jewish ruling elite and a racially mixed underclass. This is done primarily through psychological warfare. This is mostly done through an elite group that includes people with a lot of money and clout.

To the Native European: "race doesn't exist. There is no such thing as race. There are no "Aryans" it's all made up"

To his own Jewish People "race is the most important thing in the world. Let no one kid you. Jewish racial purity and racial dominance is our number one priority"

And to the the Native Palestenian "race doesn't exist. There is no such thing. There are no "Palestinian" people. It's all made up. A fabrication."

It is genocide because there will be no healthy, cohesive population left. There might be some mixed race people left with little of the original culture still in tact, delegated to second class citizen status etc.

In the short term some disruptive groups, such as blacks, may be promoted simply to create division. Over time all non-Jewish groups are to be victimized under the system and Jewish Supremacism promoted. Under the system regular Jews are also sacrificed for the goals of Zionism. Many Jews are left to die or be victimized in order to justify the zionist elite "fighting anti-semitism" through despotic leadership, unquestioning obedience, shaky morality etc. Regardless of whether an individual Jew is aware of this, he or she still indirectly supports it. Zionist groups encourage Jews to support Israel and the collective Jewish community without criticism and without regard toward non-Jews. It is no different than what Hitler demanded. If Israel rounds people up and puts them in death camps, then zionist groups would consider it anti-Semitic to criticize this action. Despotic leadership is not typically successful.

Also most nations behave themselves because they face international criticism. Israel, being largely immune to criticism, is free to act in ways that no other nation on earth would attempt to do (other than perhaps temporary dictators in Africa). Likewise the media will usually not report much news that is unfavorable to Israel (which in the United States I believe 95% or so of the media is controlled by the same six companies). Again this encourages immoral behavior. If you give a group of people absolute power, then they are more likely to act badly. This is why we have separation of powers, free press etc.

#11 mroof

mroof

    Gabbai

  • Members
  • 569 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 01:23 PM

Did anyone say that "every Israeli" contributed to the problem? I seem to recall that only confirmed terrorist groups such as Irgun were specifically mentioned.

Pay attention: I stated that "one could argue" such points.
.colorful .dreams
Posted Image
The meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances...if there is any reaction, both are transformed.

#12 sal

sal

    Gabbai

  • Members
  • 843 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 01:33 PM

No they didn't. They went to war because the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor.
You'd be hard pressed to prove that "saving millions" of Allied civilians required the deaths of German and Japanese civilians. Despite the horrific bombings of Dresden, Berlin, and Tokyo, millions of Axis civilians did survive--- and the war ended nontheless. Thus it would appear that eradicating the civilian population was not neccesary to win the war.

The burden of proof lies with you. You want to claim the Americans are guilty of killing the innocent. We have a policy innocent until proven guilty.

The fact remains that Americans have won the majority of their wars without resorting to genocide; thus I refuse to believe that it suddenly became "the only option" in WW2.

You are comparing different situations. How many world wars did america win with out destroying civilians.

You're creating a dilemma where one doesn't exist. The defeat of the Axis military did not really require the annhilation of civilian populations.

That is not relevant to my question which you refuse to answer. I created that specific scenario on purpose. I know that it did not necessarily happen, but what would you do.

This case is more akin to if I saw an Arab terrorist slaughtering Jewish schoolchildren and, instead of going after him, I picked up a gun and started shooting Arab schoolchildren---it won't stop the terrorist, but trades an atrocity for an atrocity.

My question was not killing other innocent as payback. I have no idea why you refuse to answer my question it is a question with only two possibilities.
Please answer this specific question.
There is a terrorist shooting at a school and slaughtering children. You have a shot at him, but the problem is there is a child in the way and your only option is to kill them both. What would you do? Kill both the child and the terrorist and save dozens of other children or let the child live so dozens of other children will be slaughtered. If you only had those two options.
This is the scenario I'm asking about. Is there a reason you refuse to answer?

So you think it's immoral to slaughter civilians because of their race, but it's not immoral to slaughter civilians because of their politics? I'm sorry, but if it was wrong for the German Government to kill Jewish civilians, then it was wrong for the Allied Governments to kill German civilians. The magnitude of a crime does not change with the nationality of the perpetrator.

Immorality is not measured on the action it is measured on the human intention. The exact same action can be either immoral on not. A person drives over someone and kills him. If it was an accident that doesn't make him evil. If it was intentional that is evil. You can't compare every case, you must first look at the intention. If one is intending to defend himself is not the same as someone who is intending to murder someone. It doesn't matter that the end result is that someone died. The persons intention is the factor.

To his own Jewish People "race is the most important thing in the world. Let no one kid you. Jewish racial purity and racial dominance is our number one priority"

Which respected jewish leader said that?

#13 mroof

mroof

    Gabbai

  • Members
  • 569 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 02:49 PM

I do believe that there are organized Jewish groups attempting to "break the back" of most native populations and replace them with a Jewish ruling elite and a racially mixed underclass. This is done primarily through psychological warfare. This is mostly done through an elite group that includes people with a lot of money and clout.

To the Native European: "race doesn't exist. There is no such thing as race. There are no "Aryans" it's all made up"

To his own Jewish People "race is the most important thing in the world. Let no one kid you. Jewish racial purity and racial dominance is our number one priority"

And to the the Native Palestenian "race doesn't exist. There is no such thing. There are no "Palestinian" people. It's all made up. A fabrication."

It is genocide because there will be no healthy, cohesive population left. There might be some mixed race people left with little of the original culture still in tact, delegated to second class citizen status etc.

In the short term some disruptive groups, such as blacks, may be promoted simply to create division. Over time all non-Jewish groups are to be victimized under the system and Jewish Supremacism promoted. Under the system regular Jews are also sacrificed for the goals of Zionism. Many Jews are left to die or be victimized in order to justify the zionist elite "fighting anti-semitism" through despotic leadership, unquestioning obedience, shaky morality etc. Regardless of whether an individual Jew is aware of this, he or she still indirectly supports it. Zionist groups encourage Jews to support Israel and the collective Jewish community without criticism and without regard toward non-Jews. It is no different than what Hitler demanded. If Israel rounds people up and puts them in death camps, then zionist groups would consider it anti-Semitic to criticize this action. Despotic leadership is not typically successful.

Also most nations behave themselves because they face international criticism. Israel, being largely immune to criticism, is free to act in ways that no other nation on earth would attempt to do (other than perhaps temporary dictators in Africa). Likewise the media will usually not report much news that is unfavorable to Israel (which in the United States I believe 95% or so of the media is controlled by the same six companies). Again this encourages immoral behavior. If you give a group of people absolute power, then they are more likely to act badly. This is why we have separation of powers, free press etc.


I'm sorry: Were you trying to get a point across?

All I heard was ...blah blah blah .. Jews are a race (it's not: race is a social construct)...blah blah blah...propaganda...blah blah blah .. UFOS are real and probing you every chance you get blah blah blah..

Posted Image
.colorful .dreams
Posted Image
The meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances...if there is any reaction, both are transformed.

#14 Templar

Templar

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 03:01 PM

The burden of proof lies with you. You want to claim the Americans are guilty of killing the innocent. We have a policy innocent until proven guilty.

Okay, let's use the notorious Tokyo Firebombing as an example: (From alternateperspective.com)
"The night of March 9, 1945, began typically enough for war-weary Tokyo residents. They went to bed hungry, the distant wailing of air-raid sirens lulling them to sleep.

But World War II was about to rouse them violently from their fitful dreams into a waking nightmare. Before the new day dawned, a United States air-raid killed or injured as many as 200,000 people. It obliterated a quarter of all Tokyo's buildings, leaving more than a million people homeless.

The Americans dispatched the first wave of more than 300 bombers from Guam, Saipan and the Tinian Islands, 2,500 kilometres south of Tokyo. Each plane dropped 180 oil-gel sticks, less than a metre long, on the tightly knit neighbourhoods of wooden houses. Then two waves of planes emptied their bays of a lethal cargo: napalm. The resulting inferno unleashed hell on earth.

Kiyoko Kawasaki, then a 36-year-old mother, remembers running into the street with two buckets on her head for protection, walking into a sea of fire and seeing burning bodies floating in the Sumida River. "The prostitutes who hung out by the riverbank jumped into a nearby pond," she recalled. "But the pond was boiling so they all died."

Kyoko Arai was just a middle-school student when she witnessed her neighbourhood burn to the ground in the firebombing. She watched people perish when dancing fireballs set their hair alight. Worse, she remembers mothers running into the air-raid shelters with babies in their arms. "They would try to breast-feed the babies, but actually the babies were dead," Arai said. "Some of the mothers went insane from the shock."

For survivors, the misery was just beginning. Takae Fujiki, then a 15-year-old high-school student, recalls being "chased" by the bombers. She says they hunted down fleeing civilians to deliberately drop bombs on them. And they napalmed the rivers to cut off an escape route, Fujiki says. "It was obvious they were trying to kill as many of us as possible."


The US AirForce dumped oil and napalm on what was then the most densely populated industrial city on earth, and you don't think that they intended to kill innocents?






u are comparing different situations. How many World Wars did america win with out destroying civilians.

World War I. (We've only been in two, you know.)


That is not relevant to my question which you refuse to answer. I created that specific scenario on purpose. I know that it did not necessarily happen, but what would you do.

My question was not killing other innocent as payback. I have no idea why you refuse to answer my question it is a question with only two possibilities.
Please answer this specific question.
There is a terrorist shooting at a school and slaughtering children. You have a shot at him, but the problem is there is a child in the way and your only option is to kill them both. What would you do? Kill both the child and the terrorist and save dozens of other children or let the child live so dozens of other children will be slaughtered. If you only had those two options.
This is the scenario I'm asking about. Is there a reason you refuse to answer?

Yes, there is a reason---it is totally irrelevant to what we're talking about. In your scenario, it is absolutely necessary to kill the child to save the others; in real life, it is not absolutely necessary to kill civilians in order to defeat a hostile military---or, if you wish to argue that it is, that is something you'll have to demonstrate as a certainy. The burden of proof is on you this time, bub.


If one is intending to defend himself is not the same as someone who is intending to murder someone. It doesn't matter that the end result is that someone died. The persons intention is the factor.

That cuts both ways, Sal. Hitler and his Nazis sincerely believed that the Jews were trying to covertly conquer Germany---they saw the Holocaust as self-defense. Does that excuse absolve them from the heinousness of their crimes? Hell no. The idea of slaughtering helpless civiliians as "self-defense" is depraved on the face of it, no matter the intention behind it is.

#15 ijs

ijs

    Hocker

  • Members
  • 151 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 03:08 PM

I stated that it was a hypocritical and B/S statement given the knowledge of our history as Americans. To cry 'foul' on another country for doing something we have previously done in the past, whether we contributed to it or not (one could argue that not every American attributed to such problems and as such not every Israeli has) is being hypocritical. Time is irrelevant because it does not take away from the fact that these events did occur.

Make more sense?


No. If anything, it makes less sense. A person is not responsible for the wrongdoing of others. This principle is addressed in the U.S. Constitution, albeit in a limited context: “[N]o Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood.” U.S. Const. art. III, § 3, cl. 2.

“We” did not do anything; our country did, but not us. We are not responsible for it (except insofar as we have to deal with the mess, of course). It is not hypocritical for me to say a thing is wrong even if a direct ancestor did it.

Time is indeed relevant, because while the events did occur, this does not thereby transmit responsibility for it from some persons to other persons. Strictly speaking, of course, it’s not “time” that is relevant, but rather the fact that someone else did it. Were the same people alive today, they would continue to hold that responsibility, but they don’t transmit it to someone else. The general constitutional principle expounded above – if expanded to other contexts – is that we do not punish children for the crimes of their ancestors.

Finally, it is not only not hypocritical, but whether or not responsibility is transmitted, it puts us in the position of knowing something is wrong from personal experience. Just because I hypothetically speaking did something wrong does not make it right for you to do it, nor am I a hypocrite for telling you it’s wrong, because if it’s wrong it’s wrong, irrespective of who says it. Your argument utilizes the logical fallacy of argumentum ad hominem, or argument against the person, because you disavow a position based on a characteristic of a proponent of that position. The characteristic of the person is irrelevant as to whether the thing is true. It may or may not be, but the proponent’s personal characteristics are irrelevant.

This principle is even more so if an ancestor of mine did it. You have no just cause (and remember, I’m speaking in the hypothetical) to punish me because of something my grandfather may have done to you, and I am not being hypocritical for saying so. That makes no sense whatsoever.

--------------------------------------------------

The fact remains that Americans have won the majority of their wars without resorting to genocide.


Do you have an example of a war the U.S. won by resorting to genocide? WWII certainly was not one.

Who said that Jews comitted genocide?


I hear it all the time ... that Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in their concentration camps.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Chaim Yosef ben Yaakov Avraham

חיים יוסף בך יעקב אברהם

#16 sal

sal

    Gabbai

  • Members
  • 843 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 03:16 PM

Okay, let's use the notorious Tokyo Firebombing as an example: (From alternateperspective.com)
"The night of March 9, 1945, began typically enough for war-weary Tokyo residents. They went to bed hungry, the distant wailing of air-raid sirens lulling them to sleep.

But World War II was about to rouse them violently from their fitful dreams into a waking nightmare. Before the new day dawned, a United States air-raid killed or injured as many as 200,000 people. It obliterated a quarter of all Tokyo's buildings, leaving more than a million people homeless.

The Americans dispatched the first wave of more than 300 bombers from Guam, Saipan and the Tinian Islands, 2,500 kilometres south of Tokyo. Each plane dropped 180 oil-gel sticks, less than a metre long, on the tightly knit neighbourhoods of wooden houses. Then two waves of planes emptied their bays of a lethal cargo: napalm. The resulting inferno unleashed hell on earth.

Kiyoko Kawasaki, then a 36-year-old mother, remembers running into the street with two buckets on her head for protection, walking into a sea of fire and seeing burning bodies floating in the Sumida River. "The prostitutes who hung out by the riverbank jumped into a nearby pond," she recalled. "But the pond was boiling so they all died."

Kyoko Arai was just a middle-school student when she witnessed her neighbourhood burn to the ground in the firebombing. She watched people perish when dancing fireballs set their hair alight. Worse, she remembers mothers running into the air-raid shelters with babies in their arms. "They would try to breast-feed the babies, but actually the babies were dead," Arai said. "Some of the mothers went insane from the shock."

For survivors, the misery was just beginning. Takae Fujiki, then a 15-year-old high-school student, recalls being "chased" by the bombers. She says they hunted down fleeing civilians to deliberately drop bombs on them. And they napalmed the rivers to cut off an escape route, Fujiki says. "It was obvious they were trying to kill as many of us as possible."


The US AirForce dumped oil and napalm on what was then the most densely populated industrial city on earth, and you don't think that they intended to kill innocents?

You failed to give an alternative method of winning the war. Hence you failed prove that what the americans did was immoral.


World War I. (We've only been in two, you know.)

Are you kidding millions of civilians died in ww 1.
Of course there were only 2. That was my point you can't compare all wars. Just because they were able to win smaller wars without hurting civilians does not follow that they can do the same for bigger ones.

Yes, there is a reason---it is totally irrelevant to what we're talking about. In your scenario, it is absolutely necessary to kill the child to save the others; in real life, it is not absolutely necessary to kill civilians in order to defeat a hostile military---or, if you wish to argue that it is, that is something you'll have to demonstrate as a certainy. The burden of proof is on you this time, bub.


Exactly my point. Life is not black and white. white would be when there is no choice but to kill the innocent child and black is purposely killing an innocent civilian because and for no other reason than killing a civilian.
Everything else falls somewhere in between. Sometimes it is possible to avoid killing other civilians but that would mean taking more risk. How much risk one must take to avoid civilian casualties?

That cuts both ways, Sal. Hitler and his Nazis sincerely believed that the Jews were trying to covertly conquer Germany---they saw the Holocaust as self-defense. Does that excuse absolve them from the heinousness of their crimes? Hell no. The idea of slaughtering helpless civiliians as "self-defense" is depraved on the face of it, no matter the intention behind it is.

I'm sure you understand the difference with subjectivity vs. objectivity.

#17 Templar

Templar

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 03:42 PM

You failed to give an alternative method of winning the war. Hence you failed prove that what the americans did was immoral.

Okay, even though I thought this one should be rather obvious... engage their military. The Japanese only capitulated after their military was defeated, so it would appear to have been unnecessary to slaughter their civilians. And, according to Gen. Douglas MacArthur's aide, Brigadier Gen. Bonner Fellers, the Tokyo Bombings were "one of the most ruthless and barbaric killings of noncombatants in all history."




Are you kidding millions of civilians died in ww 1.

Yes, but there weren't Government-organized allied missions specifically dedicated to eradicating them.




Exactly my point. Life is not black and white. white would be when there is no choice but to kill the innocent child and black is purposely killing an innocent civilian because and for no other reason than killing a civilian.

Posted Image







Everything else falls somewhere in between. Sometimes it is possible to avoid killing other civilians but that would mean taking more risk. How much risk one must take to avoid civilian casualties?

Don't get me wrong, I do understand your point. But I disagree with the idea that it is somehow 'necessary' to take the lives of ordinary people, non-combatants, to defeat a rival military. I concede that many civilians will die in any major war, but I personally think its immoral to target them specifically---especially in cases where it's only of arguable tactical advantage.

I'm sure you understand the difference with subjectivity vs. objectivity.

Of course. But you're not talking about that; you're talking about "intentions."

#18 sal

sal

    Gabbai

  • Members
  • 843 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 04:02 PM

Okay, even though I thought this one should be rather obvious... engage their military. We had pushed them back to Japan by the time of the firebombing in 1945, so it would appear to have been unnecessary to slaughter their civilians. And, according to Gen. Douglas MacArthur's aide, Brigadier Gen. Bonner Fellers, the Tokyo Bombings were "one of the most ruthless and barbaric killings of noncombatants in all history."

You still did not provide an alternative method. The tomahawk cruise missile had not yet been invented.

Yes, but there weren't Government-organized allied missions specifically dedicated to eradicating them.

Agreed. So just by pointing out civilian casualties does not mean terrorist.

Don't get me wrong, I do understand your point. But I disagree with the idea that it is somehow 'necessary' to take the lives of ordinary people, non-combatants, to defeat a rival military. I concede that many civilians will die in any major war, but I personally think its immoral to target them specifically---especially in cases where it's only of arguable tactical advantage.

That falls in grey area.

Of course. But you're not talking about that; you're talking about "intentions."

I'm talking about morality and everything that determines it from intention to objectivity and all other factors that matter.

#19 Templar

Templar

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 04:17 PM

You still did not provide an alternative method. The tomahawk cruise missile had not yet been invented.

So you're saying that it was impossible not to deliberately eradicate civilians before the invention of tomahawk cruise missles? I don't think that one would hold in a court of law!


That falls in grey area.

To quote you, 'you decided that'.






I'm talking about morality and everything that determines it from intention to objectivity and all other factors that matter.

Now you're singing a different tune altogether. Before you were simply talking about intentions, but have now shifted gears by tacking on moralism--- pardon me if I find that a little ironic, considering that you're trying to justify the mass-killing of civilians.

#20 sal

sal

    Gabbai

  • Members
  • 843 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 05:42 PM

So you're saying that it was impossible not to deliberately eradicate civilians before the invention of tomahawk cruise missles? I don't think that one would hold in a court of law!

I don't think the US would be held accountable in a court of law for the methods they used to win WWII.


Now you're singing a different tune altogether. Before you were simply talking about intentions, but have now shifted gears by tacking on moralism--- pardon me if I find that a little ironic, considering that you're trying to justify the mass-killing of civilians.

Isn't the whole topic about morality? Is the death justified or not.
I thought is was obvious to you that the claim of self defense must be based on objective facts. You can't say I thought he would kill me by the looks he gave me and therefore I killed him first.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users